



There should be mandatory waiting periods when credentials are reset in that way, during which time the real user is notified about the attempt to reset and has a chance to block it. These tricks can be prevented by using a 2-factor authentication method that verifies the exact address of the site the user is logging on to, such as a physical U2F key that interacts with the browser or a SQRL program running on a smart phone.Ĭustomer service reps can be tricked into “resetting” login credentials at the request of someone who is not the real user. Users can be fooled into giving up their credentials to website URLs that look similar to the real thing. The major vectors of attack have solutions that should be more widely implemented. Instead, they take advantage of human error.
#Atomic society hack software#
Most of the attacks do not rely on exploiting exotic software vulnerabilities. Nuke plant has been hacked, says Atomic Energy Agency director The Register. Symantec reveals more hack attempts on Swift network. The Cybersecurity Market Report covers the business of cybersecurity, including market sizing and industry forecasts, spending, notable M&A and IPO activity, and more. We look for the most in-depth and well thought through responses the best response as judged by the Mendeley team will earn a prize. Our Brainstorms are challenges so we can engage with you, our users, on the hottest topics in the world of research. It’s been projected that “$1 trillion will be spent globally on cybersecurity from 2017 to 2021” but is this expenditure in vain? Can our data, our banks, and our public services be truly protected? What can be done enhance security? Tell us! About Mendeley Brainstorms The goal was to use “malware to hide customers’ own records of Swift messages relating to fraudulent transactions”. On October 11, Symantec revealed that hackers had attacked users of the SWIFT financial transfer network. While he didn’t fully spell out the risks, he noted that the security breach had “caused some problems” and “some precautionary measures” were required. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said a nuclear plant had been hacked. However, this widespread connectivity also is indicative of a just as widespread vulnerability: our personal data, our public services, and even our cars could be hacked. The arrival of the Internet of Things has meant that our lives are more networked than ever before the internet isn’t merely on a computer stuck in the corner, it’s connected to our phones (which track our every movement), it’s embedded into our appliances and vehicles, it’s wired up to security cameras and to life support machines.

#Atomic society hack full#
According to Reuters, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency said the attack “caused some problems” and the plant had to “take some precautionary measures.” Given the increased prevalence of internet-enabled applications, how vulnerable are we to cyber-attacks and what can be done to prevent them? We are looking for the most well thought out answer to this question in up to 150 words: use the comment feature below the blog and please feel free to promote your research! The winner will receive an Amazon gift certificate worth £50 and a bag full of Mendeley items competition closes November 23. Recently, a nuclear power plant was hacked. Our lives are more networked than ever before how vulnerable are we?
